Home Blog Page 39

Clarivate Report Demonstrates Societal Impact of Digital Health Research and Innovation Growth

Clarivate Plc, a leading global provider of transformative intelligence, today released a Global Research Report from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)™. The report integrates and interprets multiple data sources from across Clarivate™ portfolios to highlight the academic and societal benefits of the rapidly evolving landscape of digital health.

Research impact in society and the economy: The digital health revolution in medical care highlights a rapid growth in both research and patent activity around digital health. It identifies the leading global players and organizations and their collaborations, alongside emerging companies with potential impact. By combining data from the Web of Science™ and Derwent World Patents Index™, experts at the ISI and the newly established Clarivate Center for IP and Innovation Research™ provide a comprehensive analysis of the digital health space. The analysis is presented alongside a taxonomy to categorize it into major fields, developed by analysts from the Life Sciences & Healthcare segment at Clarivate.

This study builds on a recent collaboration with Times Higher Education and initial findings were presented at Digital Health 2024, an industry-wide event held at Stanford University in February 2024.

Digital health encompasses the use of digital technologies, such as mobile apps, wearables and telemedicine, to improve health and healthcare delivery. The anticipated societal benefits of accessing and utilizing digital health include improving access to and the quality of medical care, enabling more personalized care with greater patient involvement and commitment, fostering a shift towards preventive rather than reactive care, streamlining healthcare delivery and reducing costs.

David Pendlebury, Head of Research Analysis at the Institute for Scientific Information at Clarivate and co-author of the report, said: “We are witnessing a surge in digital health research and innovation, highlighted by the significant growth in academic publications and patent filings. The outputs of this study will appeal to those interested in the future of healthcare technology and its societal impact, providing a valuable foundation for informed decision-making in this dynamic field for academic institutions, corporate entities and government bodies.”

Key findings include:

  • Significant growth in digital health publications: There has been a nearly 70-fold increase in academic papers featuring the term digital health in the decade to 2022, reflecting a major shift towards the integration of digital technologies in healthcare. This has been recently driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced analytics, predating the popularization of AI technologies such as ChatGPT.
  • Rapid increase in digital health patenting activity: Patenting activity in digital health has outpaced the growth in publications, with approximately 140,000 patent inventions identified from 2013 to 2022 – indicating robust efforts within the industry to secure intellectual capital and gain market advantage.
  • Corporate dominance in patenting: Our analysts highlight an eclectic mix of organizations, side-by-side within one patent analysis — Snap and AstraZeneca, Nike and Johnson & Johnson or Eli Lilly and Nvidia — demonstrating the convergent and collaborative nature of the field of digital health.
  • Strength of AI patenting in digital health: Mainland China, represented by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, universities and corporations, plays a pivotal role in this field.
  • Impact of university research on digital health innovation: University research significantly influences digital health innovation, with research papers frequently cited by patents, highlighting their role in driving intellectual property advancements.

Emmanuel Thiveaud, Senior Vice President of Research and Analytics, Academia & Government at Clarivate said: “At Clarivate, our transformative intelligence seamlessly integrates enriched data, insightful analytics, workflow solutions and profound domain expertise across the entire spectrum of knowledge, research, health and innovation. We have combined them to demonstrate that digital health is a fundamental shift in how healthcare is delivered and experienced. By leveraging comprehensive data resources and expert analysis, stakeholders can develop strategies that maximize both academic benefits and societal impact.”

SPARC Europe is embarking on a year-long process to create a broader open agenda by connecting Open Science and Open Education.

With 20 years of action in the Open space, SPARC Europe is embarking on a year-long process to create a broader open agenda by connecting Open Science and Open Education. Making this connection has benefits for research, education and society. Through this work, SPARC Europe will help European public universities realise the value of open, equitable and fair access to knowledge for all. SPARC Europe’s new project Connecting the worlds of Open Science and Open Education to increase capacity for an Open Europe makes the case for more integration in the open agenda. It will also let us more effectively support openness in European Higher Education on a policy and practice level.

This project enables our three-phased vision to build an evidence base to raise awareness among university leaders about the advantages of connecting the worlds of open. The project’s three phases involve mapping Open Science and Open Education Higher Education actors across Europe, documenting similarities and differences between Open Science and Open Education and the risks and opportunities involved in connecting them, and laying the groundwork for SPARC Europe’s role as a one-stop shop or information clearinghouse to connect the worlds of Open Science and Open Education in Europe. We will produce a bibliographic reference list, hold a series of interviews with senior university leaders on the Open Agenda, create talking points and design a case for a broader Open Agenda.

We are excited about this work that will take us into the summer of 2025. We are kicking off the activities of this project with two expert consultants, Paul Stacey and Wilma van Wezenbeek, who are coaching, guiding, steering and supporting the SPARC Europe team to build our capacity in this area. This is generously funded with an Organisational Effectiveness Grant from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, as part of a programme that fosters growth and capacity-building for grantees to be able to meet their strategic goals.

NISO Publishes Recommended Practice for the Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern

The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) today announced the publication of the Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern (CREC) Recommended Practice (NISO RP-45-2024). Funding for the CREC Working Group as well as for research at the University of Illinois’ Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science (RISRS) project, which aided Working Group deliberations and decisions, was generously provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

Retracted publications are research outputs that have been found to be flawed, unreliable, or otherwise invalidated from the scholarly record. There are a number of reasons why publications may be retracted, but in all cases, correcting the record requires that these decisions be clearly communicated and broadly understood so that the research—whether retracted due to error, misconduct, or fraud—is not propagated. The NISO Recommended Practice establishes best practices for the creation, transfer, and display of retraction-related metadata, ensuring that participants (publishers, aggregators, full-text hosts, libraries, and researchers) can communicate retraction information quickly and enabling readers who discover a publication to readily identify its status.

“With the publication of the CREC Recommended Practice, NISO has taken an important step toward limiting the impact and spread of retracted publications,” stated Caitlin Bakker, Discovery Technologies Librarian at the University of Regina and co-chair of the Working Group. “We thank the Working Group members as well as all those who commented on the draft and helped to ensure that the workflows it outlines address the needs of all interested parties.”

“We’re excited to see the Working Group’s efforts come to fruition,” added Jodi Schneider, Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Principal Investigator for the RISRS II: Research and Development towards the Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern project. “And we hope that wider adoption of the NISO guidelines will help to build trust in science and in academic research more generally.”

NISO’s Executive Director, Todd Carpenter, stated, “With retractions on the rise, the CREC Recommended Practice represents an important cross-industry effort by libraries, publishers, and vendors to advance research integrity. We are grateful to the Working Group and its co-chairs for leading this project, as well as to the Sloan Foundation for its support.”

The NISO CREC Recommended Practice is freely available at https://www.niso.org/standards-committees/crec.

Transformative Journals: analysis from the 2023 reports

The Transformative Journal (TJ) model was one of the strategies cOAlition S developed to help subscription publishers transition to full and immediate Open Access (OA) in a defined timeframe. This report looks at the data provided by the participating publishers for the calendar year 2023.  

2023 data: executive summary 

Journals that participate in the TJ programme agree to share data showing the OA penetration rate and whether they have met their agreed growth targets.   

Specifically, TJ titles are required to demonstrate an annual increase in the proportion of OA research content of at least 5% points in absolute terms and at least 15% in relative terms, year-on-year.  Journals in the programme also agree to flip to full OA when 75% of the research content is published in this way.  

Analysis of the 2023 data shows that of the 996 titles in the TJ programme: 

  • 39 titles (4%) had flipped to full OA and thus had successfully transformed, in line with the programme objectives 
  • 403 titles (40%) met or exceeded their OA growth targets  
  • 552 titles (56%) failed to meet their OA growth targets and, had the TJ programme continued, would have been removed from the TJ programme 
  • 2 titles (<1%) only started publishing in 2023 and thus did not have a 2023 TJ target. 

A further 57 journals, all published by Cambridge University Press, are in the process of flipping in 2025.  Springer Nature also indicated that 14 journals are likely to flip in 2025, though the titles affected are not yet in the public domain. 

Read the full report – https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/transformative-journals-analysis-from-the-2023-reports/

RLUK and The National Archives sign collaboration agreement

RLUK is delighted to have signed a collaboration agreement with The National Archives for the period 2024-2027. The agreement continues our joint work under our previous Memorandum of Understanding, and underlines our shared commitment to cross-sector collaboration, driving innovation and workforce development in our sectors, and exploring new ways to engage audiences with our collections and services. Since 2014, our organisations have worked together on strategic areas of common interest and values.

These activities include the DCDC Conference series, which RLUK co-organised with The National Archives from 2013 to 2022, and the TNA-RLUK Professional Fellowship Scheme, which enables staff from both organisations to share experience and insight and to address collective challenges facing research and cultural organisations.

David Prosser, Executive Director of RLUK, said: ‘We are delighted to be continuing our partnership with The National Archives and this agreement will help us to further identify shared challenges and opportunities that we can effectively address through working together.’

De Gruyter to make 37 more journals freely available via Subscribe to Open model in 2025

De Gruyter is expanding its Subscribe-to-Open program DG2O, with plans to transform an additional 37 journals into open access by 2025.

Among the journals in the DG2O program that will switch to open access in the coming year are particularly renowned titles such as the Historische Zeitschrift, founded in 1859, the Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, first published in 1888, as well as esteemed periodicals committed to critical perspectives on socio-political questions such as Analyse und Kritik (founded in 1979) and feministische studien (founded in 1982).

With the expansion of the De Gruyter S2O program to include additional key humanities and social sciences titles, important research from disciplines that have so far been underrepresented in the move towards open access will be made freely available online to readers around the world. There will be no publication fees (APCs) for authors, making the model particularly fair and inclusive for researchers in disciplines where financial support for APCs is less established.

Initial analyses of the De Gruyter journals that have already been transformed into open access as part of DG2O show that they are read significantly more often and in significantly more countries worldwide since they have been opened.

The titles to be added in 2025 also include reputed De Gruyter science journals with a long heritage such as Zeitschrift für Kristallographie – Crystalline Materials (founded 1877) and Biological Chemistry (founded 1878).

Last year, De Gruyter was the first major academic publisher to announce Subscribe to Open as the central transformation model of its open access strategy. In 2023, 42% of De Gruyter’s total journal program was freely accessible online in open access. The inclusion of 37 additional titles in the DG2O program will increase the Subscribe to Open portfolio at De Gruyter to nearly 60 titles in 2025. In total, De Gruyter plans to gradually convert around 270 subscription journals to open access by 2028, using the Subscribe to Open model in close consultation with editors and societies.

“We are delighted to be taking another step towards realizing our full journal program transformation, and we are grateful for how libraries and consortia have been supporting our S2O program,” says Dr. Christina Lembrecht, Senior Manager Open Research Strategy at De Gruyter, adding: “It is encouraging to see that not only our S2O program is flourishing, but the model is also being used more and more internationally and the Subscribe to Open Community of Practice is growing steadily.”

“As editors of the Historische Zeitschrift, we are very pleased about this step towards accessibility,” say Prof. Julia Hillner and Prof. Andreas Fahrmeir, continuing: “We find it particularly important that the journal does not charge publication fees as before and thus remains accessible to authors regardless of their status in the academic system.”

ResearchGate and CABI announce Journal Home partnership

ResearchGate, the professional network for researchers, and CABI, an international, intergovernmental, not-for-profit scientific research and publishing organisation, today announced a new partnership that will increase the visibility of CABI’s research journals through ResearchGate’s innovative Journal Home offering. CABI is ResearchGate’s first IGO partner publisherwith the following journals included in the partnership: CABI One Health (open access), CABI Reviews (hybrid) and Human-Animal Interactions (open access).

CABI publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed articles covering global agricultural and environmental issues and the applied life sciences. The published research enables people to discover validated, evidence-based information to help them overcome some of the world’s biggest challenges. The partnership will see the version-of-record from three of CABI’s journals, including archive content and new articles on publication, made available on ResearchGate, increasing the reach and readership of these titles with ResearchGate’s community of 26 million researcher members.

Journal Home will additionally deliver enhanced brand visibility for the CABI journals. Dedicated journal profiles will be activated on the ResearchGate platform and will also be prominently featured on all associated articles and relevant touchpoints throughout the network. These profiles support readers and potential authors by providing key information and content from the journals, as well as allowing ResearchGate members to explore how their own network is connected to a journal.  

For CABI authors, the ResearchGate partnership means their articles will be automatically uploaded to their ResearchGate profile. This provides a unique opportunity for authors, often working in areas that support both practitioners and scientists, to understand who is benefiting from their work through insights about who is reading their content as well as the means to connect with their readers.

“We are delighted to be working with ResearchGate to make our journals even more accessible to researchers globally,” said Erika Newton, Journals Publisher at CABI. “Journal Homepresents a new way for our journals and authors to interact and engage with researchers around the world, which is highly important in CABI’s mission to ensure content is accessible to all those who need it.”

“We’re excited to be working with CABI as our first IGO, not-for-profit partner publisher,” said Sören Hofmayer, co-founder and Chief Strategy Officer at ResearchGate. “CABI’s essential research is helping to address the sustainable development goals and solve global challenges. By harnessing the highly relevant researcher community on ResearchGate, we can help to expand the reach and readership of their important works to new audiences around the world.”

For more information about Journal Home, please visit researchgate.net/journal-home

For more information about CABI, please visit https://www.cabi.org/ 

PLOS Announces New Publishing Agreement with Colombian Consortium

The Public Library of Science (PLOS) is pleased to announce a consortium agreement with Consorcio Colombia / Consortia facilitated by Accucoms, that allows joining member institutions to participate in PLOS’ three innovative publishing models across all 14 PLOS titles. The agreement provides researchers from affiliated institutions unlimited publishing privileges in PLOS journals without incurring fees. Eight Colombian institutions have joined the agreement in 2024 [1], and more institutions are expected to join in the following years.

“Consorcio Colombia is a collaborative work initiative with great recognition in Latin America and constantly seeks options to facilitate access to information and open access in the country. That is why it decided to sign an agreement with PLOS to facilitate the publication of the research community in one of the most important open access publishers in the world. With this, we hope to increase the visibility and academic impact of our research while promoting sustainable models of scientific communication,” said César Rendón, CEO of Consortia.

Mónica Cristancho, Library Director at Universidad El Bosque, one of the participating institutions in 2024, said, “Collaborating with PLOS, through the open access agreement with Consorcio Colombia, has been crucial in promoting the publications of researchers from Universidad El Bosque. Thanks to this partnership, our researchers have the opportunity to share their discoveries widely and accessibly, adhering to the fundamental principle of open access to scientific information. This not only democratizes knowledge, allowing anyone to freely access research findings, but also fosters global collaboration. Thus, this agreement is not only beneficial for our institution and our researchers, but also contributes to the advancement of science and the welfare of society at large.”

PLOS institutional business models such as Community Action Publishing (CAP) [2], Flat Fees [3], and Global Equity [4] ensure more equitable and regionally appropriate ways to support Open Access publishing.

“Our agreement with Consorcio Colombia will help to expand PLOS’ footprint in South America and provide equitable access to Open Science opportunities for researchers in the region,” said Roheena Anand, Executive Director of Global Publishing Development & Sales at PLOS. “Consorcio Colombia shares our intention of removing barriers for authors to publish Open Access and building business models which move journals toward a more equitable and fee-free form of publishing.”

“I am happy to have collaborated on the negotiation of a very first PLOS consortium agreement in Latin America. This agreement allows Colombian institutions to sign up for unlimited publishing in all PLOS journals without APC fees for their researchers, at a very accessible cost for the institutions. It is great to see that 8 institutions have already signed up in 2024, and I’m confident many more Colombian institutions will understand the benefits of this agreement and will join in the coming few years,” said Anouk Snijders, Commercial Manager Latin America, Accucoms.

The members of Consorcio Colombia join a growing list of institutions in Latin America, including UNAM, CINVESTAV, and INCMNSZ in Mexico and Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina in Peru among others, to support their researchers through unlimited publishing deals with PLOS.

The Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP)  honored PLOS as the 2021 co-winner for Innovation in Publishing for its Community Action Publishing model.

Altmetric 500 data offers wider insight into research’s most influential articles

Digital Science, a technology company serving stakeholders across the research ecosystem, today announces an exciting new tranche of data that throws light on how and why research cuts through to society at large – in the shape of the Altmetric 500.

A decade on from the first Altmetric 100 reports, which listed the most influential academic articles in a given year, a leading provider of alternative metrics for published research is now releasing an upgraded overview of research engagement: the Altmetric 500. 

The Altmetric 500, which analyses the attention for scholarly articles published in 2023,  covers over 50 research categories – representing different fields of research (FoR), geographies and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – and reflects activity across 11 different attention sources, including:

  • news articles
  • academic citations
  • policy citations
  • blogs
  • Wikipedia pages
  • X (Twitter) profiles.

“We are delighted to release the Altmetric 500, enabling us to recognize and highlight some of the most influential articles of the year. By extending the scope of the Altmetric 500 to fields of research, countries and even SDGs, we will provide a real flavour of what research has been generating interest and discussion in many different areas,” says Cat Williams, Managing Director of Digital Science’s Data & Analytics Hub.

“A key feature of attention to research is that some outputs can gain attention in one area while being barely acknowledged in another. We can see this in the Altmetric 500, and it really serves to demonstrate how relying on a wider range of indicators is really important for gathering more comprehensive insights,” Ms Williams says.

“The overall aim for the Altmetric 500 is to provide a new way to explore the different meanings of ‘attention’ to research, highlighting the various impacts of research across different channels, platforms and cultures.”

Analysis of the Altmetric 500 highlights:

    • Harvard University and the University of Oxford feature most frequently, with 12 top articles across the 500 categories in 2023 for Harvard, and 11 for Oxford. The University of Toronto had 9.
    • Springer Nature is the most influential publisher with 81 category-leading publications, ahead of Elsevier (53) and Taylor & Francis (48).
    • The European Research Council (ERC) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) are the most successful funders, with ERC supporting 14 top publications and NSFC supporting 13.

    Through the rest of 2024, Altmetric and Digital Science will explore these impacts and provide examples and use cases for how the data can be leveraged to provide unique insights into research outcomes.

    For more information, you can read a blog published by Altmetric on the new initiative: https://www.altmetric.com/blog/varied-layers-of-attention-the-altmetric-500/

    First original research papers published in IOP Publishing’s prestigious journal Reports on Progress in Physics 

    IOP Publishing (IOPP) has published the first original research papers in its flagship journal, Reports on Progress in Physics, adding to its 90-year legacy as one of the world’s most authoritative sources of physics review content.  

    The first four original research articles are:  

    Extracting the speed of sound in quark-gluon plasma with ultra-relativistic lead-lead collisions at the LHC 

    Symmetry-preserving quadratic Lindbladian and dissipation driven topological transitions in Gaussian states 

    Divergence beneath the Brillouin sphere and the phenomenology of prediction error in spherical harmonic series approximations of the gravitational field 

    A statistical primer on classical period-finding techniques in astronomy 

    Reports on Progress in Physics sits at the pinnacle of IOPP’s extensive physics portfolio of journals and covers all areas of physics and related interdisciplinary areas extending across condensed matter, atomic and molecular physics, quantum science, computational physics, chemical physics, biophysics, photonics, nuclear and particle physics and astrophysics.   

    The journal offers an open access (OA) option, with free OA publishing for researchers from low and lower middle-income countries. In addition, Reports on Progress in Physics is included in IOPP’s expanding programme of Transformative Agreements that now cover more than 1,000 universities and research institutions around the world.   

    Chief Editor of Reports on Progress in Physics, Dr David Gevaux, says: ‘Releasing the first original research papers in our expanded Reports of Progress in Physics journal in the year of its 90th anniversary is fantastic. The progress and innovation seen over the past nine decades promises a bright future for our evolving physical sciences journal.”  

    The latest issue of Reports on Progress in Physics also features an editorial in which Gevaux sets out the rationale for repositioning the journal and how it will serve the physics community into the future.   

    The journal’s Editor-in-Chief, Professor Subir Sachdev of Harvard University, USA, says: “The quality and coverage of our first original research papers reinforces the long-standing reputation of Reports on Progress in Physics as one of the most important resources for physicists at all career stages.” 

    Authors publishing in Reports on Progress in Physics are not only supporting the advancement of physics in the broadest sense but also invest in the community they are a part of. All funds generated by IOP Publishing go directly to the Institute of Physics.  

    Clarivate Reveals World’s Leading and Trusted Journals with the 2024 Journal Citation Reports 

    Clarivate Plc, a leading global provider of transformative intelligence, today released the 2024 update to the Journal Citation Reports™ (JCR™). The reports provide an essential and comprehensive resource of high-quality journals, ranked by field to enable academic institutions, researchers and publishers to gauge the significance of journals in the global research landscape. Changes to journal rankings include the addition of the Emerging Sources Citation Index. 

    Only journals that have met the rigorous quality standards for inclusion in the Web of Science Core Collection™ are featured within the Journal Citation Reports, to ensure that users can confidently rely on the information and descriptive data provided. The annual reports provide a rich array of publisher–independent data, metrics and analysis to enhance user understanding of journal performance, including the widely recognized Journal Impact Factor™ (JIF™) and the Journal Citation Indicator™.  

    This year, for the first time, the JCR includes unified rankings across subject categories. There will no longer be separate JIF rankings for the nine subject categories that are indexed in multiple editions. Now those journals will receive a single ranking in their subject category, and the separate rankings will be eliminated. For example, a psychiatry journal listed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)™ and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)™ will now be ranked in one unified Psychiatry ranking rather than two.  

    Key highlights for the 2024 release: 

    • The JCR has been enhanced to provide an easier and more complete user experience. It includes the integration of journals from the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) in the new unified category rankings.  
    • Coverage of more than 21,800 journals – including ~5,800 journals which publish all their content via open access. 
    • Scholarly journals from 113 countries, across 254 categories are recognized and receive a JIF. This includes 14,090 science journals, 7,321 social science journals and 3,304 arts & humanities journals. 
    • 544 journals receive a Journal Impact Factor for the first time. 

    Dr. Nandita Quaderi, Senior Vice President & Editor-in-Chief, Web of Science, Clarivate, said: “The creation of unified rankings is part of a series of policy changes we have made to support research integrity and help level the global playing field by making the JIF a marker of trust as well as scholarly impact. Last year we extended the JIF to include ESCI journals. This year by ranking ESCI journals alongside all other journals in the same subject category we are sending another strong signal that all trustworthy journals – including newer journals and those with a niche or regional focus – should be valued and given consideration, regardless of how highly cited they are.” 

    Emmanuel Thiveaud, Senior Vice President, Research and Analytics, Academia & Government at Clarivate said: “For nearly half a century, the global research community has relied on the annual Journal Citation Reports to confidently identify leading and trusted journals in their fields. This year’s enhancements are designed to address the evolving needs of our customers and the unified rankings across subject categories will enhance their ability to evaluate the performance of journals.” 

    To explore all available data, metrics and analysis visit the Journal Citation Reports.  

    67 Bricks partners with ICLR to integrate Jurisage’s natural language summaries of law reports

    ICLR are enhancing their case law research platform Law Reports with natural language summaries, powered by Canadian law tech developer Jurisage. The new functionality has been seamlessly integrated into ICLR.4 by 67 Bricks, ICLR’S long-standing technology partner. 

    Utilising a highly customized Large Language Model (LLM), the summaries respond to sophisticated prompts. These brief overviews will be indispensable for ICLR.4 subscribers as they sift through results from either a conventional case search or the similar cases suggested by the AI-driven Case Genie tool. 

    Each summary, approximately 100 words, encapsulates essential case elements: the foundational premise of the case, the key entities involved, and the subsequent decision. Complemented by an index of key legal issues pertinent to each case, these summaries provide critical insights that will accelerate the process of legal research by aiding users to assess the relevance of a case report at a glance. 

    “The law does not stand still, and neither does the technology by which we learn and apply it.” said Paul Magrath, Head of Product Development, ICLR. “As the leading supplier of Law Reports for England and Wales, ICLR is delighted to partner with Canadian law tech developer Jurisage in creating a really useful addition to our case law research platform. The project has been implemented with customary panache by our longstanding partners 67 Bricks, as part of the continuing development of the ICLR.4 platform, which they host. These AI case summaries, together with our AI-driven search tool Case Genie, will enable subscribers quickly and easily to identify the relevant judgments that are critical to their research”. 

    This pioneering partnership between ICLR and Jurisage, integrated by 67 Bricks, signifies a cutting-edge juncture where advanced AI technology strengthens traditional legal procedures, amplifying the accessibility of high-quality legal resources for the community.

    Jurisage Group CEO Aaron Wenner says,“We’re delighted to be chosen by ICLR for our AI technology expertise in legal research and case law. It’s gratifying to see ICLR’s highly regarded law reporting services enhanced with faster access to usable summaries in the formats that legal practitioners demand.”