Home Blog Page 42

De Gruyter declares offer for Brill unconditional; 96.12% of the Securities tendered

  • A total of 96.12% of the Securities have been tendered.
  • All Offer Conditions have been satisfied or waived.
  • De Gruyter declares the Offer for Brill unconditional.
  • Settlement of the Offer will take place on 20 February 2024.
  • Remaining Securities can be tendered during the Post-Closing Acceptance Period, commencing on 16 February 2024 and ending on 28 February 2024.

With-reference to the joint press release dated 12 October 2023 and 8 November 2023 and the Offer Memorandum, Brill and De Gruyter are pleased to announce that Securities representing 96.12% of Brill’s outstanding capital have been tendered under the Offer and that all other Offer Conditions have been satisfied or waived. As a result, the Offeror declares the Offer unconditional (doet gestand). Securityholders who have not yet tendered their Securities may tender their Securities during the Post-Closing Acceptance Period, commencing on 16 February 2024 at 09:00 hours CET and ending on 28 February 2024 at 17:40 hours CET.

Read the full press release

Charlesworth partners with the Association for Computing Machinery to provide WeChat marketing services in China.

Charlesworth is happy to announce an extension to our partnership with ACM to include WeChat marketing services in China. Charlesworth currently provides sales representation services in China, which includes managing the largest transformational publishing deal in China between ACM and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. 

Association for Computing Machinery is the world’s largest educational and scientific computing society, committed to advancing computing as a science and a profession. Through this partnership, Charlesworth will support the growth of ACM authorship in China, aligning with the opportunities offered through its ACM Open model for authors.

Scott Delman, ACM’s Director of Publications, notes, “Over the past decade, China has become a global force in computing research and is now on par with the United States and Europe in terms of both quality and quantity of computer science research results being published in the top computer science publication venues by ACM and the other major scholarly publishers. Engaging with the Chinese computing community on platforms like WeChat has become a high priority for ACM and we are thrilled to be working with Charlesworth to make this happen.”

Andrew Smith, Product and Marketing Director at Charlesworth commented “WeChat is the largest social media platform in China and presence on the platform is vital for any brand looking to create an online community in the country. By bringing together sales and author marketing services in China, Charlesworth can support ACM in its ongoing transformation towards ACM Open and facilitate ACM’s ongoing efforts to better communicate with and serve the Chinese-speaking computing community.”  

US funders meet to discuss cultural change in open science

In January, Frontiers hosted a discussion forum for United States-based research funders to explore the challenges and opportunities funders face in supporting and incentivizing open science. Representatives from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Alzheimer’s Association came together to address three major topics:

  • The role of funders in leading open access
  • Prominent, practical, and promising examples of open access
  • New initiatives to define and shape open access

The parallels with European funders were also discussed, in follow-up to a similar funders’ session Frontiers hosted in spring 2023.

The US funders in January’s session were asked how the OSTP Nelson Memo – the August 2022 guidance on widening public access to federally funded research – has changed the way they operate and view scholarly communication. They appreciate that the Memo supports policies that the funders themselves have suggested and incentivized for some time, and they acknowledge that federal policies can support more open science frameworks, many of which (such as open access) are already mainstream.

Funders play a significant role in driving the cultural change required to fulfill the visions of open science generally and of the Nelson Memo in particular. Funders have a responsibility to understand their communities’ needs, particularly in areas that might be less developed, such as open data, open protocols, and other types of outputs. There is a generational distinction as well; funders noted the differences between established principal investigators and emerging ones, along with traditional incentive structures.

The cultural shift plays out in other ways for funders. In terms of research assessment, funders see a general trend to move away from quantitative metrics and toward a more holistic approach to assessing researchers.

These shifting views of assessment have led funders to diversify their views of appropriate outputs for grant funding. A peer-reviewed article arrives in a late stage of the research cycle, whereas pre-prints, open datasets, and other sharable materials are seen as increasingly valuable by the funders and their communities. But how to share these kinds of outputs and how to incentivize their communities to share them in a timely manner is a challenge for the funders.

As an open access publisher with the mission to make all science open, Frontiers emphasizes building relationships with research funders who are important strategic actors with the power to accelerate the transition to open science. Frontiers is committed to ensuring that we provide the necessary support to researchers, authors, editors, other stakeholders and, of course, the funders themselves. As part of this commitment, we strive to provide fair, high-quality, and tailored solutions to funders who want to enter an institutional partnership with us.

If you would like to learn more about this or future events or discuss our partnership models, please contact institutions@frontiersin.org or visit our institutional partnerships website.

Publishers Association welcomes Lords Committee AI report

A call for the government to take urgent action to support rightsholders in the face of mass infringement by Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models (LLMs) has been welcomed by the Publishers Association.

The recommendation forms part of a new report from the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee published today which says government “cannot sit on its hands” while LLMs exploit the works of rightsholders for huge financial gain. The report criticises tech firms for using data without permission or compensation and encourages the government to end the copyright dispute “definitively” using legislation if necessary. It calls for greater transparency for rightsholders to see if their work has been used without consent and for investment in new datasets to encourage tech firms to pay for licensed content.

Dan Conway, CEO of the Publishers Association, said: “This report rightly recognises that the benefits of AI do not warrant the violation of copyright law and its underlying principles. As the Committee states, it is not fair for tech firms to use rightsholders’ content for huge financial gain without permission or compensation.  

“The Publishers Association welcomes the prominent call for the government to take action to support rightsholders. We gave evidence to the committee’s inquiry last year and it’s great to see their report backing many of our key arguments – that LLMs shouldn’t use copyright-protected works without permission or compensation, that there should be support for licensing, that there should be transparency, and that the government should legislate if necessary.

“Publishers have long embraced the benefits of AI in their work and share the committee’s ambition for a positive vision on AI, where the myriad opportunities are embraced but rightsholders and human creativity are respected, permissions are sought, and licensing is supported. This report is a call to action for government at a pivotal moment for the UK’s approach to AI.”

Silverchair and OUP launch Sensus Impact

In collaboration with more than 30 industry organizations, Silverchair and Oxford University Press (OUP) have today launched Sensus Impact— a new initiative to enhance reporting and demonstrate the impact of research supported by funders. By connecting the academic community with a range of insightful metrics in one place, Sensus Impact will help address the industry-wide challenge of fragmented measurement and reporting. 

At the initiative’s core is a new platform that collates and centralizes a range of metrics about the impact of research, including citation, usage, and attention data. This combination of high-quality data from sources such as Altmetric, will provide funders with unique insight into the performance of the research they fund. In turn, this further enables them to measure and evaluate its impact following publication in academic journals.    

Sensus Impact is supported by an engaged Community of Practice, including representatives from publishers, funders, and learned societies. This community will continue to play a key role in shaping the initiative, by actively identifying opportunities for additional data visualizations, data points, and functionalities, ensuring that the platform is built by and for the academic community.  

As Hannah Heckner Swain, VP of Product at Silverchair shares: “I’m incredibly happy to publicly launch Sensus Impact, having been a part of this initiative’s ideation since it was just a twinkle in our eye. This launch reflects the impact of our engaged Community of Practice, Silverchair publisher partners, other technology vendors, and friendships in the funding community. Today’s launch is just the beginning. I look forward to being a part of this product’s maturation into a multi-faceted and multi-publisher product that demonstrates the full value of publishers and funders within the scholarly ecosystem.”  

Speaking about the value of Sensus Impact, Alison Denby, VP of Journals at OUP, comments: “Solving industry-wide challenges requires a collaborative, industry-led approach. By engaging in initiatives like Sensus Impact, both funders and publishers can enhance their ability to showcase and assess the impact of funded research. This increased transparency in academic publishing will help drive ambition for high-impact and influential research, which is fundamentally what we are all here to do.” 
 
Sensus Impact is live today with 18 funder hubs, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Smithsonian Institute.  

To learn more about Sensus Impact and explore the funder dashboards, visit the website here.  

To get involved in the Sensus Community of Practice, reach out here.  

BioOne and CSIRO Publishing Expand Partnership with New eBook Collection

Post

A newly curated collection of more than 200 eBooks will be available on the BioOne Digital Library in 2024 through an extension of BioOne’s partnership with CSIRO Publishing, an editorially independent business unit of CSIRO, Australia’s National Science Agency.

Through this collaboration BioOne will make available a specialized collection of CSIRO Publishing catalog titles specifically selected to complement BioOne’s areas of focus, invaluable resources for environmental, plant and animal scientists, and researchers, practitioners, and students in related disciplines. The strength of this eBook curation is the diversity of content relevant to BioOne customers, covering decades of trusted knowledge. Representing unique species from Australia, as well as outcomes of key research with global applications, the collection will enhance the depth and breadth of any library. The CSIRO Publishing BioSelect Collection will be available for cost-effective institutional license under a one-time purchase model beginning in mid-2024.

“We are pleased to be expanding our relationship with BioOne to now include an eBook Collection,” said Briana Melideo, Books Publisher, CSIRO Publishing. “This collection represents decades of trusted knowledge, through a curation of titles offering a broad range of biological subject matter. The content represents not only unique Australian flora and fauna but also globally relevant conservation science and applications. We are thrilled to see these titles reach a wide audience through this partnership with BioOne.”

“We’re proud to expand our partnership with CSIRO Publishing to bring their important research to the libraries and institutions we serve,” said BioOne Director of Sales and Community Outreach, Christine Orr. “This project, the second collection from our BioOne eBooks program, demonstrates our commitment to collaboration with our publisher partners and our shared vision to find new sustainable pathways to advance the biological sciences.”

De Gruyter and American Political Science Association (APSA) sign partnership agreement

De Gruyter and the American Political Science Association (APSA) are pleased to announce an agreement on a cooperation partnership to publish two new book series: The De Gruyter-APSA Teaching Civic Engagement Series and The De Gruyter-APSA Political Science Professional Development Series.

The De Gruyter-APSA Teaching Civic Engagement Series will publish must-have texts that offer unique, comprehensive, and applied research in support of civic engagement pedagogy globally, to help faculty to prepare students with the knowledge, skills, values, and confidence they need to be active, engaged citizens. The De Gruyter-APSA Political Science Professional Development Serieswill publish essential texts on professional development topics for those navigating the academic life cycle in political science, from graduate school to academic and applied careers – and beyond.

In its many activities, APSA plays a key role both in advancing civic engagement and in supporting current and aspiring political scientists on their career paths. Books in these Book Series will continue to serve these audiences well.

“Providing resources for teaching and learning, civic engagement and professional development for political scientists is a key part of APSA’s mission,” said Steven Rathgeb Smith, APSA Executive Director, “and we are delighted to be partnering with a historic publisher like De Gruyter on these new book series to expand our offering and reach of these titles for our members and the entire discipline.”

De Gruyter’s growing Social Sciences program is rapidly building up its own global English-language political science publishing program. Books in the program address contemporary and applied concerns, embrace interdisciplinarity, and feature books that make an impact in American politics, international politics, and broad political studies.

With 270 years of experience, De Gruyter is one of the leading global academic publishers, internationally renowned for publishing the critical editions of great philosophers such as Kant, Marx, and Nietzsche, and serving an ever-growing academic community worldwide. Through the Institutional Partner program, De Gruyter is a trusted partner to support the goals, values, and brand of centers, societies, and organizations like the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities at Bard College and Medieval Institute at Western Michigan University.

“We are proud to publish these new Book Series together with the American Political Science Association. The partnership with APSA is a key milestone in our North America plan and we are so pleased to be working with such an esteemed scholarly society to advance their mission and ours,” said Gerhard Boomgaarden, Editorial Director for Social Sciences at De Gruyter.

Introducing CABI Cases in Animal Science and Food Science and Nutrition

CABI is pleased to introduce two new titles in its collection of case studies: Animal Science Cases and Food Science and Nutrition Cases. The titles have been launched to answer the need for practical, educational resources in these subject areas. CABI Cases are backed by CABI’s longstanding expertise in research and publishing in agriculture, the environment, and the applied life sciences.

“Alongside our traditional online resources and our books and journals, CABI Cases reflect the work we’re doing to meet the needs of academic users,” commented Damian Bird, Publishing and Operations Director, CABI. “CABI Cases offer valuable insights in support of learning objectives and authors appreciate the short format to easily share their experience and expertise.”

Animal Science Cases and Food Science and Nutrition Cases join four other titles, namely Animal Behaviour and Welfare Cases, One Health Cases, Plant Heath Cases, and Tourism Cases. Feedback on CABI Cases is very positive – users appreciate the diversity of authors and experiences, and authors regularly describe their publication experience as fast, professional, and supportive.

Animal Science Cases is a collection of case studies which explore examples of animal science in practice. The case studies apply the biological, physical, and social sciences to problems associated with livestock production and management. Subjects range from livestock nutrition to climate change adaptation.

“The value of Animal Science Cases is that they show how academic, scientific advances have been translated into advances in commercial practices. The insights are invaluable for young scientists to understand some of the constraints that industry faces and how ideas are brought to the market.” Mike Bedford, AB Vista Feed Ingredients Ltd, UK andAnimal Science Cases advisory board member.

Food Science and Nutrition Cases is a collection of case studies with a focus on the growing area of food science and nutrition. The case studies address nutrition, food quality and quality of diet and their impact on health. They also consider food in relation to chemistry, microbiology, production, processing, formulation, engineering, analysis, and regulation. As for anyone looking to improve their diet, an app like the Calorie calculator could be an invaluable tool.

Food Science and Nutrition Cases reflects the intricate relationship between food science and nutrition in modern food systems. Each case study brings together the latest research developments and knowledge in the topic area, to demonstrate how these disciplines work together to support food security and public health. This is a welcome addition to our teaching resources, and the accessible and lively style is appreciated by students.” Edward Fox, Associate Professor, Northumbria University and Food Science and Nutrition Cases advisory board member.

Morressier partners with imagetwin to provide powerful AI-based image analysis to protect research integrity in life sciences

Morressier, the Berlin-based startup transforming scholarly communications, today announced its partnership with imagetwin. Under the partnership, Morressier’s workflows now feature automated analysis of scientific images, providing editors and peer reviewers with tools to detect potential issues such as plagiarism and manipulation, early and at scale.

Images used for the communication of research in the life sciences, from western blots to microscopy and x-ray scattering images, are increasingly prone to copying and manipulation. The problem is so bad that integrity sleuth Elisabeth Bik declared that Science Has a Nasty Photoshopping Problem.

Dr. Bik and other volunteers in the life-science community, such as David Sholto, who recently identified issues with research at the Harvard-affiliated Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, have been successfully offering crowdsourced analysis to identify potential issues with scientific images and raising awareness of integrity issues in the life sciences. However, the scale and rate of publication in the field means that fraudulent or sloppy research inevitably slips through the submissions process and ultimately enters the scientific record.

Leveraging recent advances in machine learning, imagetwin can now automatically and rapidly perform deep analysis of images, providing editors and peer-reviewers with signals at the very moment that they are assessing research and making editorial decisions.

imagetwin’s state-of-the-art technologies are now available in Morressier’s Integrity Manager as well as across its workflows for proceedings, and will be available in its manuscript submission system which is currently under development.

“Image manipulation is a massive threat to research integrity in the life-science community,” said Sami Benchekroun, Morressier co-founder and CEO. “imagetwin’s powerful AI-based image fraud detection is the perfect addition to the integrity checks Morressier offers, from identifying suspicious citation patterns to paper-mill detection. The academic publishing community now has the tools it needs to rip out scientific fraud at the root.”

“We are delighted to build a partnership with a strong player like Morressier to make our software available to a bigger audience,” said imagetwin CEO and co-founder Patrick Starke. “Image manipulation is a growing problem and it is vital to get these AI-based tools

Digital Science identifies questionable research at heart of US abortion drug case

A Digital Science investigation into a series of research papers used in a high-profile abortion drug case in the United States has found that the articles breached publication ethics and used unreliable methods.

The published research was considered in Texas federal court in 2023, in the case of Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al vs the Federal Drug Administration. This case, aimed at overturning FDA approval of the abortion drug Mifepristone, will now be heard in the US Supreme Court in March.

Sage Publishing has this week announced that two of the papers used in the court case – published in the journal Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology – have been retracted, along with another paper, following an investigation that identified concerns about:

  • Conflicts of interest
  • Problems with peer review
  • Statistical issues
  • Lack of academic rigor.

Among the concerns raised by Sage were “fundamental problems” with study design and methodology, “unjustified or incorrect factual assumptions”, “material errors” in analysis, “misleading presentations of the data”, undisclosed conflicts of interest among authors and a peer reviewer, and “unreliable” peer review and study conclusions.

Digital Science has published its own findings in a post on its website. These include comparisons of the research papers used in the legal case, showing they did not match up to the world’s best research in the field, or the top journals publishing that research, identified with the use of Dimensions data. There was also a lack of adherence to academic standards and ethical practices, such as non-disclosure of multiple conflicts of interest among authors.

Dr Leslie McIntosh, Digital Science’s VP Research Integrity, says: “Because of our interest in research integrity, we felt this court case was worthy of further investigation, in which we asked ourselves: How were scientific papers and science presented and used as evidence? When science is incorrectly used – specifically in the case of law – there may be far-reaching consequences. 

“What we would have expected: The strongest research on mifepristone, published in quality journals, with rigorous peer reviews and any conflicts of interests described. What we found, however, did not meet these standards.

“If the court system utilizes scholarly articles to establish scientific truths, then it relies on a system that may be vulnerable to influence by stakeholders who aim to advance their agendas rather than advancing impartial science.

“This issue highlights that more must be done to detect and prevent the manipulation or misuse of science and conflicts of interest in the courts.

“Through their diligence, Sage Journals is correcting the scientific record, and I commend them for their integrity.”

For more details about the Digital Science investigation, see the post Science Misused in the Law – A Case Study of the Scientific Articles Cited in the US Mifepristone Court Case.

ResearchGate and Cambridge University Press & Assessment announce new Journal Home partnership

ResearchGate, the professional network for researchers, and Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), the academic and Bibles publisher of Cambridge University Press & Assessment, today announced a new Journal Home partnership for sixteen of CUP’s open access (OA) journals – including their innovative Cambridge Prisms and Research Directions titles. This partnership aims to increase these journals’ global reach and engagement through ResearchGate’s 25 million researcher members.  

All version-of-record content from the sixteen journals will be made available on ResearchGate, including newly published articles and all archive material. Additionally, the journals will benefit from enhanced visibility through dedicated profiles for each journal, and prominent journal branding activated across all associated article pages and other touchpoints on the ResearchGate platform.

The new partnership will also provide enhanced services for Cambridge authors. All authors in the participating journals will have their articles automatically added to their profiles on ResearchGate and will gain access to statistics highlighting the impact of their work, including who is reading and citing their research. 

“We’re keen to work with ResearchGate and to measure the impact that inclusion on the platform will have on these selected OA journals,” said Jenny Mathias, Global Marketing and Operations Director, Academic Publishing. “We’re looking for the partnership to both support the visibility of our journals, and to provide our authors with an opportunity to connect directly with their readers, enhancing their understanding of who is engaging with their work. We look forward to seeing the results of this collaboration.”

“Cambridge University Press is one of the world’s best-known academic publishing houses, and we are thrilled to embark on this new partnership,” said Sören Hofmayer, Chief Strategy Officer at ResearchGate. “Cambridge recognizes the importance of innovation and collaboration to spread knowledge. We couldn’t be happier to support these goals through ResearchGate, ensuring wider visibility with our highly engaged researcher community.” 

The partnership initially covers the following journals:

  • Parasitology
  • Geological Magazine
  • Epidemiology and Infection
  • Data Centric Engineering
  • Gut Microbiome
  • Wearable Technologies
  • Flow
  • Research Directions: One Health
  • Research Directions: Biotechnology Design
  • Research Directions: Quantum Technologies
  • Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures
  • Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine
  • Cambridge Prisms: Extinction
  • Cambridge Prisms: Plastics
  • Cambridge Prisms: Water
  • Cambridge Prisms: Drylands
  • Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

For more information about ResearchGate, please visit www.researchgate.net

For more information about Cambridge University Press, please visit cambridge.org/universitypress

New Springer Nature Transformative Agreements Widen Global Impact of U.S. Research

Springer Nature has reached new Transformative Agreements (TAs) with VIVA – Virginia’s academic library consortium – and OhioLINK, Ohio’s academic library consortium, that will boost open science, increase coverage for underserved researchers, break down barriers to access for funding, and broaden the reach and support for open access (OA) publishing in the United States. New TAs with VIVA and OhioLINK will contribute a 100% increase in articles covered under Springer TAs in the Americas in 2024, with that number expected to continue to rise as more agreements are concluded.

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Biden administration issued the Nelson memo, ordering all U.S. agencies to ensure immediate public access to federally-funded research publications in a step toward a fully OA U.S. In the effort to follow through on the Nelson memo, TAs have proven to be the most effective approach to achieving immediate OA for all primary research. This is because TAs consolidate subscription fees expended by libraries for access to reading paywalled journals and article processing charges (APCs) expended by authors to publish OA, into one agreement with an eye to cost-control and the scholarly transition to OA. 

A recent Springer Nature OA case study featuring three U.S. institutions – Carnegie Mellon, the University of California, and the Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium (SCELC), provides evidence of how TAs help to magnify the impact of researchers’ work. At the University of California alone, OA articles published by University of California authors through the Springer TA in 2021 and 2022, were downloaded more than 3.6 million times worldwide – a 120% increase over the previous year, prior to the Springer TA.

The Springer Nature case study offers additional insights into the U.S.’s OA journey. One of the most salient, is that research faculty are integral to the scholarly ecosystem and play an important role in maintaining the integrity of research and creating global impact. The greater visibility TAs provide to such researchers are an added benefit to this consequential community. Driving this point home, panelists discussing TAs at the 2023 Charleston Library Conference – a national November gathering of academic librarians, noted that the driving factor behind TAs are researchers themselves choosing to publish OA.

Carrie Webster, Vice President of Open Access at Springer Nature, said: “TAs drive equity by allowing researchers who would not have enough funding otherwise, to instantly publish their articles open access in journals of their choosing. Open access articles are more frequently read and cited than those published behind paywalls and allow researchers to conduct collaborative research internationally. The primary catalyst of transformative agreements is the decision of researchers to publish open access.”

Amy Pawlowski, Executive Director at OhioLINK, said: “We are very happy to work with Springer to both expand access to Ohio’s scholarship and remove barriers to research and learning.”

Genya O’Gara, Acting VIVA Director, said: “We’re pleased to collaborate with Springer on this new agreement, aimed at significantly expanding the reach of Virginia’s research and scholarship while enhancing Virginia authors’ access to publishing opportunities. This partnership underscores VIVA’s dedication to providing equitable publishing opportunities for researchers in Virginia and ensuring access to learning materials for all students, irrespective of their institution.” 

Also of significance, is that the wider reach Springer Nature TAs provide for US research globally – supporting the OA standing of publications at more than 3,500 institutions worldwide – should be seen as a competitive national advantage, helping the U.S. to maintain an edge on innovation.